For Ângelo de Sousa colour is a matter of choice, arrangement and intensity, and even a single line can be drawn in a vast range of variations. He moves from lines of colour to whole swathes in drawings and paintings: strips where a figure is captured or signs are inscribed, or bordered by their complementary colour, ovals and bright segments, sheets and layers, chromatic fractions descending and converging into a valley or a rainbow.

 

Works such as Geométrico Grande [Large Geometrical Painting] (1967), which is made up of coloured triangles arranged both on a flat plane and in such a way as to suggest volume through a combination of optical effects conjured by the colour and its positioning in relation to each polygon, and works that feature minute flecks in many different colours, from the same year, pre-date the gradual introduction of different chromatic elements which some of the artist's paintings from 1972 and 1973 already show to an advanced degree, with small patches and layers still discernable on the surface. From this point on, his paintings would show a commitment to this approach, as is the case with his canvases entirely steeped in an even shade of yellow, orange or green, where one can just about make out underlying layers in other colours, pulsating beneath like the secret ingredient for a saturated, shimmering and intense surface.

 

 

The steady movement from the demarcation to the contamination of territories extends to various works dating from the 1970s, 80s and 90s. The background and the form share the same plane, and not infrequently a vague geometrical line calls for a certain effort on the part of the viewer. The lines mark out frontiers which do not set apart any natural difference. The depth of these paintings is geological rather than representative. It alludes to layers, not vanishing points. It is based on the imperceptible, and submersion into a chromatic density beneath the dominant colour. In the Monocromos [Monochromes] some colours weigh beneath others, and a mere line which splits into two angles, almost rendered invisible for being so obtuse, and the subtle slope of the line that divides what might be mosaics, recalls that latent colour.

 

One of the comments most frequently made about Ângelo de Sousa is that he brings together concepts such as renouncement, economy, structural nudity, essentiality, rigour, empty space, purity, stylisation, and austere, minimal, basic vocabulary. Such attributes mean that critics frequently refer to minimalism when discussing Ângelo de Sousa. However, he was never a follower of the American minimalist movement. Ernesto de Sousa explains it well in an article published in the magazine Colóquio-Artes in June 1975, in which he says that “all of Ângelo de Sousa’s works reveal a rigorous and logical investigation in the sense of the “minimalist” practice, without this meaning that the artist has made a commitment to minimalism”.

 

Ângelo de Sousa himself made the famous following statement about his quest for purity: “Maximum effect with minimum resources; maximum efficiency with minimum effort; maximum presence with a minimum of screaming”.

 

 

Leonor Nazaré

May 2013